Anglicizing Spanish (2)

| 3 Comments

Now we come to the consonants.

Castilian Spanish is one of the few European languages to include a voiceless dental fricative /?/ in its phoneme inventory. As this is a very common sound in English, it should present no problems whatsoever for the English speaker. Unfortunately, orthographically, it is either <c> or <z>. This leads non-Spanish-speaking native English speakers to associate it with a lisped /s/, and many will refuse to use it, on the grounds that “it sounds cissy”. Try telling a madrileo taxi driver that he sounds cissy, and see where it gets you! However, certain names seem to have beaten this: Olazbal for one. When the golfer of that name first became prominent, the mispronunciation used as an anglicization put the stress on the wrong syllable, but included the /?/ correctly (despite the consistently correct stress in the BBC Pronunciation Unit’s recommendation from the day he hit the news, it was only when he insisted in a press conference that this was right that anyone took notice of it. So much for the influence of the Pronunciation Unit).

The voiced counterpart to /?/ is not listed as a phoneme in its own right, but occurs as the most frequent allophone of /d/: [d] appears in word initial position following a rhythmical pause, and following /n/ or /l/. Elsewhere it is realized as []. Here is another sound that causes no problem to English speakers, but seeing it spelt as <d> makes them shy away from the easy but non-intuitive interpretation.

<b> and <v> are interchangeable – representing [b] word initially following a rhythmical pause, and following /m/; and [] elsewhere. Generally speaking, it is acceptable to interpret them into English as /b/ and /v/ respectively, so that Barcelona is anglicized with initial /b/, and Valencia with initial /v/.

There’s not a lot that can be done with /g/ (either [g] or [?]) except treat it always as English /g/. N.B. Spanish <ng> is always [?g] regardless of position, and so /?g/ in English.

Spanish <ll> varies greatly from one dialect to another, but an English speaker can never go wrong treating it as the sequence /l/ + /j/, so Portillo becomes /p?:’ti:lj??/. Likewise the palatal nasal, <> easily becomes /n/ + /j/. Beware of words that look as if they ought to be spelt <> but aren’t: Habanera, the name of the famous aria from Carmen, for example, means “of Havana”, and has no tilde above the<n>, and so should be pronounced /b?’ne?r?/ in English.

<ch> represents (almost) the same sound as its counterpart in English: macho, machismo are pronounced ‘mt???, m?’t?i:zm??, and not, as so often heard *['mx??, m?'k?zm??], as if they were somehow German or Italian.

<h> on its own is always silent.

<j> and <g> before <e> or <i> are the voiceless velar fricative /x/, so Sergio becomes in English /’se?x???/ (or /’se?h???/ for those who can’t cope with Scottish or Welsh names).

<qu> represents /k/ before <e> or <i>. The <u> is never pronounced separately in this position.

<x> is usually /ks/, but sometimes, as in Mxico, may be pronounced /x/

3 Comments

  1. A very useful summary. There’s one possible ambiguity: ” and before or <i> are the voiceless velar fricative /x/” would be clearer if you changed the punctuation to “, and before or , are the voiceless velar fricative /x/”. (Ie is always /x/.)

    With there are in principle three possibilities, exemplified by , and : [x], [?] and [?w] respectively. Ie the is pronounced only when marked with a diaeresis. Anglophones should therefore be discouraged from saying /san mi’gwel/ when they order a beer.

  2. Sorry, just can’t cope with the angled brackets! The 3 examples I typed were Angel, Miguel & Argelles, so I hope it’s clear what I was getting at …

  3. If you want to see < in your post, type the four letters &lt; instead.

    In the U.S. we do much the same things, but since U.S. Spanish has seseo and yeïsmo, we say /s/ for s, /z/ for z (to use /s/ for z is the mark of a sophisticate), and either /l/ or /j/ for ll. It’s not unknown for /j/ to be used for Italian ll as well, by false analogy!

Leave a Reply

Required fields are marked *.