<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Weak form loss</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.linguism.co.uk/language/weak-form-loss/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.linguism.co.uk/language/weak-form-loss</link>
	<description>Language in a word</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 22:06:06 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Philip TAYLOR</title>
		<link>http://www.linguism.co.uk/language/weak-form-loss/comment-page-1#comment-9456</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip TAYLOR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 23:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linguism.co.uk/?p=365#comment-9456</guid>
		<description>Although I would agree with most of your findings in this context, I must disagree that the weak form of &quot;pence&quot; has been lost.  Certainly I continue to use /… p(ə)ns/ (as in /ˈtʌp(ə)ns/, / ˈθrʌp(ə)ns/, /ˈfɔːp(ə)ns/, etc.), and I cannot recall an occasion on which I was asked to repeat myself in order to be understood.  However, as a check, I have just asked my wife (36 years old, and a non-native speaker of ) to hand me (in turn) /ˈtʌp(ə)ns/, / ˈθrʌp(ə)ns/ and /ˈfɔːp(ə)ns/ and the only one she got correct was the last.  For /ˈtʌp(ə)ns/, she handed me 1p; for / ˈθrʌp(ə)ns/ she asked &quot;what&#039;s that ?&quot;.  So I suspect that the weak form is indeed rare, although not yet completely extinct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I would agree with most of your findings in this context, I must disagree that the weak form of &#8220;pence&#8221; has been lost.  Certainly I continue to use /… p(ə)ns/ (as in /ˈtʌp(ə)ns/, / ˈθrʌp(ə)ns/, /ˈfɔːp(ə)ns/, etc.), and I cannot recall an occasion on which I was asked to repeat myself in order to be understood.  However, as a check, I have just asked my wife (36 years old, and a non-native speaker of ) to hand me (in turn) /ˈtʌp(ə)ns/, / ˈθrʌp(ə)ns/ and /ˈfɔːp(ə)ns/ and the only one she got correct was the last.  For /ˈtʌp(ə)ns/, she handed me 1p; for / ˈθrʌp(ə)ns/ she asked &#8220;what&#8217;s that ?&#8221;.  So I suspect that the weak form is indeed rare, although not yet completely extinct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

