<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pity poor Belgium</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.linguism.co.uk/language/pity-poor-belgium/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.linguism.co.uk/language/pity-poor-belgium</link>
	<description>Language in a word</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 22:06:06 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pierre</title>
		<link>http://www.linguism.co.uk/language/pity-poor-belgium/comment-page-1#comment-17503</link>
		<dc:creator>Pierre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 20:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linguism.co.uk/?p=487#comment-17503</guid>
		<description>John, How both pretentious and ignorant you can be!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, How both pretentious and ignorant you can be!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Cowan</title>
		<link>http://www.linguism.co.uk/language/pity-poor-belgium/comment-page-1#comment-16514</link>
		<dc:creator>John Cowan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 21:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linguism.co.uk/?p=487#comment-16514</guid>
		<description>It wasn&#039;t meant to be either, just a plain statement of facts on the ground.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It wasn&#8217;t meant to be either, just a plain statement of facts on the ground.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip Deceunynck</title>
		<link>http://www.linguism.co.uk/language/pity-poor-belgium/comment-page-1#comment-16335</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip Deceunynck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 09:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linguism.co.uk/?p=487#comment-16335</guid>
		<description>Ha ha, John, aren&#039;t we funny? And so very original!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha ha, John, aren&#8217;t we funny? And so very original!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Cowan</title>
		<link>http://www.linguism.co.uk/language/pity-poor-belgium/comment-page-1#comment-15282</link>
		<dc:creator>John Cowan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 21:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linguism.co.uk/?p=487#comment-15282</guid>
		<description>In any case, there are no Belgians except the King of the Belgians and his family.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In any case, there are no Belgians except the King of the Belgians and his family.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James D</title>
		<link>http://www.linguism.co.uk/language/pity-poor-belgium/comment-page-1#comment-15271</link>
		<dc:creator>James D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 15:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linguism.co.uk/?p=487#comment-15271</guid>
		<description>Perhaps this is related to the &quot;California Wine&quot; phenomenon?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps this is related to the &#8220;California Wine&#8221; phenomenon?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: garic</title>
		<link>http://www.linguism.co.uk/language/pity-poor-belgium/comment-page-1#comment-15264</link>
		<dc:creator>garic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 12:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linguism.co.uk/?p=487#comment-15264</guid>
		<description>Interesting, though it&#039;s easy to see where the confusion comes from: both &quot;Belgium&quot; and &quot;Belgian&quot; end in schwa followed by a nasal stop, which aren&#039;t terribly easy to distinguish acoustically. 

I&#039;ve noticed a similar tendency online to write &quot;prejudice&quot; or &quot;bias&quot; for &quot;prejudiced&quot; and &quot;biased&quot; (and so on), where you have a voiceless alveolar plosive following a voiceless alveolar fricative.  In normal speech, of course, the plosive tends to be unreleased (or &quot;unrelease&quot;).

I think the most interesting thing about both cases is that writers are basing their spelling more on phonetic than on morphosyntactic patterns. There&#039;s a generalisation they&#039;ve missed.  Other examples include &quot;I would of&quot; and punctuation used with regard to pauses in speech, but with no regard to syntactic structure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting, though it&#8217;s easy to see where the confusion comes from: both &#8220;Belgium&#8221; and &#8220;Belgian&#8221; end in schwa followed by a nasal stop, which aren&#8217;t terribly easy to distinguish acoustically. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve noticed a similar tendency online to write &#8220;prejudice&#8221; or &#8220;bias&#8221; for &#8220;prejudiced&#8221; and &#8220;biased&#8221; (and so on), where you have a voiceless alveolar plosive following a voiceless alveolar fricative.  In normal speech, of course, the plosive tends to be unreleased (or &#8220;unrelease&#8221;).</p>
<p>I think the most interesting thing about both cases is that writers are basing their spelling more on phonetic than on morphosyntactic patterns. There&#8217;s a generalisation they&#8217;ve missed.  Other examples include &#8220;I would of&#8221; and punctuation used with regard to pauses in speech, but with no regard to syntactic structure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

