<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Linguistic Rhythm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.linguism.co.uk/language/linguistic-rhythm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.linguism.co.uk/language/linguistic-rhythm</link>
	<description>Language in a word</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 03:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Abdul</title>
		<link>http://www.linguism.co.uk/language/linguistic-rhythm#comment-766</link>
		<dc:creator>Abdul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 10:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linguism.co.uk/language/linguistic-rhythm#comment-766</guid>
		<description>You are right. It is said (if my quote is correct) that when Daniel Jones asked Abercrombie one day: "Which machine are you going to use for your phonetic field-work, David?" Abercrombie pointed to his ears. 

In phonetics, machines  can just help us to consolidate our perceptual  findings. We cannot always depend on experimental findings. It is unfortunate that, these days phoneticians rely solely on experimental evidence and they ignore other perceptual evidence. In fact many phoneticians these days do not know basic phonetic measures like Cardinal Vowels etc. When I asked the late Peter Ladefoged: "What do your students in American universities use if they want to refer to different vowel qualities in two or more regional dialects?" His answer was" "They compare formants, plotting on vowel diagrams!"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are right. It is said (if my quote is correct) that when Daniel Jones asked Abercrombie one day: &#8220;Which machine are you going to use for your phonetic field-work, David?&#8221; Abercrombie pointed to his ears. </p>
<p>In phonetics, machines  can just help us to consolidate our perceptual  findings. We cannot always depend on experimental findings. It is unfortunate that, these days phoneticians rely solely on experimental evidence and they ignore other perceptual evidence. In fact many phoneticians these days do not know basic phonetic measures like Cardinal Vowels etc. When I asked the late Peter Ladefoged: &#8220;What do your students in American universities use if they want to refer to different vowel qualities in two or more regional dialects?&#8221; His answer was&#8221; &#8220;They compare formants, plotting on vowel diagrams!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
