Moon Landing
- Author: Graham
- Filed under: General
Jul 18,2009
This has nothing to do with language, but this weekend, the world commemorates the 40th aniversary of the first moon landing.
In the US, it is celebrated as 20 July. This is correct (in UTC) for the landing, but I remember clearly staying up until three in the morning of 21 July to watch Neil Armstrong make his giant step live on television in the UK.
When things happen on Earth, the date and time when they happen can be decided by the longitude of the event, so that Columbus reached the Americas some five hours earlier than the simultaneous time in Europe. Captain Cook sighted Australia some hours later than the time would have been in Europe, and possibly a day later than it was at that moment in America. Each New Year creeps up on Earth gradually over the space of a whole day.
But when an event happens elsewhere in the universe, whose terrestrial time zone is the one to use? While 20 July is correct for the Americas, much of the populated world will have watched the moon landing on 21 July local time – Europe, Asia, Africa, Australasia.
Archives
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
Links
Recent Posts
- Bulger
- Pronunciation mayhem?
- Unclear English
- The Queen’s English Society
- A taliswoman, and how to remediate
- Paradisical vestiges
- Latin and English – again
- Olivia O’Leary
- Waverley
- Spanish rhythm
- Homing in
- Cognitive
- Bleck Het
- Moshtarak
- Wymondham (Norfolk) and Wymondley (Hertfordshire)
Recent Comments
- Noel on English spelling reform
- Graham on The Queen’s English Society
- The Queen’s English Society deplores your impurities « Sentence first on The Queen’s English Society
- Martin Ball on The Queen’s English Society
- dw on The Queen’s English Society
- Mark Poxon on The Oxford BBC Guide to Pronunciation
- Mark Poxon on More on BBC Pronunciation
- Remd on French linguistic politics
- Neal Whitman on A taliswoman, and how to remediate
- Harry Campbell on A taliswoman, and how to remediate
- Remd on English spelling reform
- Graham on English spelling reform
- Val Yule on English spelling reform
- Allan Kiisk on English spelling reform
- Graham on English spelling reform
One Response for "Moon Landing"
I’m not sure that I agree that this has nothing to do with language, because saying what day something happens is one of the functions of language.
It gets more complicated when different countries use different calendars. A favourite example concerns the deaths of Shakespeare and Cervantes, for which some sources give the same date, 23 April 1616, and in honour of this UNESCO chose 23 April as the International Day of the Book. However, although they may have died on the same date they certainly didn’t die on the same day, because in 1616 Spain had adopted the Gregorian calendar and England had not.
Another example is the October Revolution, which occurred in November by our reckoning. By coincidence Language Hat has a pertinent post this week, in which he tells us that “In Macedonian, Listopad means October.
In Polish and Slovenian, Listopad means November.” Although this apparently has nothing to do with the October Revolution, it must generate confusion when translating texts about it into these languages.
Leave a reply